litiGator
New York, NY
Male, 34
I represent all types of accident victims who have suffered injuries through the fault of others. Whether it's a motor vehicle accident, trip/slip and fall, injured on the job, wrongful death, products liability, toxic torts and many more, I help my clients receive compensation for their medical bills, lost time from work and the pain and suffering they have endured and will continue to endure from their accident.
They didn't necessarily skyrocket, but I do believe that the personal injury field is recession-proof. There may have been a few more lawsuits a few years back, but whether the economy is in good shape or bad shape, a case still needs to be legitimate to bring a lawsuit. There may have been more people calling lawyers to inquire about possible lawsuits because they needed money, but ultimately, if the case is a loser, we're not going to take it.
Hotel Front Desk Agent
What's the MOST trashed you've ever found a hotel room?Social Security Employee
Did the US economic collapse cause a surge in disability applicants?CPR Trainer
Is it possible to perform CPR on animals?Unfortunately this is the norm in personal injury lawsuits. The Defendant has the opportunity to send you to a doctor of their choosing to examine you and write a report to be used at trial. These doctors are basically on the payroll of the insurance companies. As long as they keep writing reports which state that the Plaintiff isn't injured, they will continue to use them. These doctors, who rarely actually treat patients anymore as a part of their practice, make millions of dollars writing reports and testifying for insurance companies and defendants. Ultimately, it's up to a jury to determine if they believe the treating doctors for the Plaintiff, or this doctor that was paid for by the insurance company. It's a terrible system, but nothing can really be done about it. It's up to your lawyer to make their doctor seem like a fraud to a jury.
Picking a jury is by far the most politically incorrect process i've ever been apart of. There are studies that show what kind of juror will be more favorable to a plaintiff or to a defendant. Since, the thought process is to get people on your jury that will favor your side more than the other we use these studies as a benchmark for who we want on a jury. Without getting too politically incorrect, i'll simply say this. Juries in the Bronx give the highest verdicts of any county in America whereas juries in Manhattan, Westchester and Long Island tend to be alot more Defendant friendly and more conservative with their awards.
Actually, I'm glad I can answer no to this question. I really haven't noticed this before although I have seen favoritism from Judges before. Usually though, that favoritisim is because a Judge may have a better relationship with one attorney over the other, or may dislike an attorney for the way he's behaved in his courtroom before. I've also seen Judges show favoritism towards witnesses before, but I believe that was really just based on the witness either being really likeable or the witness lying through their teeth. Thankfully, nothing to do with gender, race or age.
-OR-
Login with Facebook(max 20 characters - letters, numbers, and underscores only. Note that your username is private, and you have the option to choose an alias when asking questions or hosting a Q&A.)
(A valid e-mail address is required. Your e-mail will not be shared with anyone.)
(min 5 characters)
By checking this box, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to Jobstr.com’s Terms and Privacy Policy.
-OR-
Register with Facebook(Don't worry: you'll be able to choose an alias when asking questions or hosting a Q&A.)